Candidate confidence
Feedback can demonstrate that your consultants were respectful, realistic about the market and helpful throughout the process.
Review growth guide
A practical UK guide to collecting, managing and using genuine recruitment-agency reviews without compromising candidate privacy or platform rules.
Review marketing for recruitment agencies is not simply about asking for more five-star ratings. It is a structured way to collect genuine feedback from the people you have served, respond professionally when something has gone wrong, and use approved feedback to make your expertise easier to assess.
Recruitment is unusually personal. A candidate may be between roles, a client may be hiring confidentially, and a temporary worker may have an employment relationship with the agency. The right approach therefore combines a consistent request process with privacy safeguards, careful public responses and evidence that reflects the service you actually provide.
Hiring managers and candidates are making a high-trust choice. They want to know whether an agency understands their sector, communicates clearly, gives useful feedback and handles sensitive information with care. A vague claim such as “we are recruitment experts” is less persuasive than several independent accounts of what it was like to work with you.
For locally focused agencies, reviews can also support visibility on Google. Google says that local results are mainly based on relevance, distance and prominence, and that more reviews and positive ratings can help a business’s local ranking. That is helpful context, not a promise that a particular number of reviews will produce a particular position. A complete profile, accurate location details, your website, links from other sites and searcher location all still matter.
Feedback can demonstrate that your consultants were respectful, realistic about the market and helpful throughout the process.
Client reviews can show that you understood a brief, supplied suitable people and stayed accountable after introduction or placement.
Recurring comments about communication, speed, interview preparation or quality of shortlist reveal where your delivery needs attention.
The strongest review programme is therefore a service-improvement loop: deliver a clear process, invite honest feedback consistently, act on patterns, and share only feedback you have a right to use.
Use each channel for its real job. Trying to force every reviewer towards one platform creates unnecessary friction and can encourage poor practice.
| Channel | Best use | Recruitment-specific caution |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile | Local discovery, branch credibility and visible public feedback. | Only use a profile where the business is eligible; do not pressure people, incentivise reviews or filter out anyone likely to be critical. |
| Your website | Detailed client stories, sector-specific proof and controlled testimonial pages. | Obtain clear permission before publishing a name, employer, job title, photograph, role details or quotation. |
| LinkedIn recommendations | Personal credibility for consultants and visible professional relationships. | Keep the recommendation voluntary and never reveal a confidential vacancy, salary, employer or candidate status. |
| Private feedback survey | Learning from unsuccessful processes, complaints and sensitive feedback. | It should not become a gate that sends only happy respondents to Google. |
A recruitment agency with a staffed branch where it meets candidates or clients in person will often have a legitimate local presence. But a remote-only recruitment brand should not create a Google Business Profile merely to collect reviews. Google says a business must make in-person contact with customers during its stated hours to qualify, and online-only businesses are not eligible. Its guidance also requires a publicly shown address to have permanent fixed signage, while service-area businesses must not use unstaffed virtual offices. Read Google’s Business Profile eligibility guidance and representation guidelines before adding locations.
For a multi-branch agency, use one profile for each genuine, separately staffed location rather than one listing per consultant, desk or postcode you would like to target. Keep each location’s telephone number, opening hours, website destination and address accurate. A useful next step is to review the wider profile setup in this Google Business Profile optimisation guide.
Recruitment reviews work only when the reviewer is free to express their real view. Set a written policy that every consultant and administrator understands. It should cover who may be invited, what may never be offered, how you protect identities and who is allowed to reply publicly.
Google prohibits incentives in exchange for reviews, asking for a specific rating or wording, and selectively soliciting positive reviews. Its policy also says merchants must not discourage negative feedback. The UK’s consumer-protection regime prohibits fake reviews and reviews that hide an incentive; businesses publishing reviews must take reasonable and proportionate steps to prevent and remove misleading material. See Google’s fake engagement policy and the CMA’s short guide to fake reviews.
Review gating is screening people through a satisfaction question, then directing only those who give a high score to a public review platform. It can also be less obvious: asking only successful placements, only friendly clients, or only candidates who already praised a consultant by email.
Instead, use a neutral eligibility rule. For example, invite every client contact after a completed retained search, or invite every candidate whose active application has closed and who has received your agreed feedback. This does not mean you must invite people at a distressing or inappropriate moment. It means the rule should be based on a service milestone, not on a prediction of their rating.
Never ask your employees, internal recruiters, friends, family, suppliers or other people with a conflict of interest to rate the agency. Take particular care with agency workers and contractors paid by your employment business: a public review from someone with an employment relationship can create a conflict and may also expose sensitive details. Google explicitly identifies employment, contractual and consultancy relationships as potential conflicts in its rating-manipulation rules.
For sensitive audiences, a private feedback route may be more appropriate than a public review request. You can still use the learning without putting someone’s career move, employer relationship or personal circumstances into the public domain.
A public review can reveal far more than a star rating. “Thanks for helping me leave my role at Company X after maternity leave” may disclose an employer, employment plans and personal information. Even a well-intentioned public response can confirm that someone applied, interviewed, was placed or complained.
The Recruitment & Employment Confederation’s professional code places weight on confidentiality and privacy of candidate and client information. That principle should shape your review process, whether or not your agency is an REC member. Read the REC Code of Professional Practice alongside your own contractual and privacy obligations.
A person choosing to post on Google controls their own public review. That does not automatically give your agency permission to copy that review onto your website, a brochure, a case study, social media or a sales presentation. For reuse, ask separately and record exactly what they agreed you may publish.
In recruitment, written permission should state the approved quotation, name format, job title, employer name, photograph if any, channels, intended duration and whether the person can withdraw permission for future use. Offer practical alternatives such as “placed candidate, healthcare, Manchester” rather than a full name. Do not promise anonymity if the surrounding facts would plainly identify the person.
A request for operational feedback may be part of service delivery, but an invitation designed to generate public endorsement can also engage direct-marketing and data-protection considerations. The ICO says organisations must identify a lawful basis for processing personal data, be transparent about the use, and comply with PECR where electronic marketing rules apply. Build the review request into your privacy review rather than assuming that an existing candidate or client record is enough. See the ICO’s marketing and data protection guidance. Obtain legal or data-protection advice for your particular database, message type and lawful basis.
A good workflow makes reviews a normal final stage of service, not an awkward favour requested only when a consultant remembers. It should be light enough that busy teams will follow it and controlled enough that your agency can demonstrate fair practice.
Choose moments that reflect a real interaction: after a client’s completed assignment, after a candidate’s process has formally ended, or after an agreed post-placement check-in. Avoid sending invitations immediately after an offer, while a candidate is deciding, or during a live complaint.
Use a CRM tag or placement-status trigger so invitations are based on the milestone, not a consultant’s judgement about who is likely to praise the agency. Exclude only documented cases such as an active dispute, safeguarding concern, opt-out or an identified conflict of interest.
Use a single direct link to the relevant profile. Google lets businesses create a review link or QR code and says it may be shared by email, WhatsApp or Facebook; do not attach a reward, ask for a star rating or tell people what to write. See Google’s review-link and QR-code instructions.
Add a simple line such as “If you would prefer to share feedback privately, reply to this email.” This is a customer-care route, not a filter that directs praise to Google and criticism into a hidden inbox.
Record the invitation date, channel, service type and outcome where appropriate. Review themes monthly: for example, response time, briefing quality, interview preparation, candidate feedback, compliance or post-placement support.
If your team needs a straightforward system for creating review links, scheduling fair invitations and tracking outcomes, see how to collect reviews consistently. Agencies that want to keep the process in-house may also find the DIY Review Flywheel Software useful.
Hi [First name],
Thank you for working with [Agency name]. We are always looking to improve how we support people through the recruitment process.
If you are comfortable sharing an honest review of your experience, you can do so here: [review link]. There is no obligation, and please do not include details you would prefer to keep private, such as your employer, vacancy or personal circumstances.
If you would rather share feedback directly with us, simply reply to this email.
Best wishes,
[Name] at [Agency]
Hi [First name],
Thank you for choosing [Agency name] for your recent recruitment support. If you have a moment, we would value an honest review of your experience: [review link].
Please only share information that is suitable for public use; there is no need to mention confidential roles, applicants, salary information or commercial terms. If you would prefer to give feedback privately, reply here and we will make sure it reaches the right person.
Kind regards,
[Name] at [Agency]
These templates intentionally avoid “five-star”, “positive”, “help us beat competitors” and “please mention [consultant]”. Google’s policy says businesses should not pressure reviewers or request specific review content. Let people describe their experience in their own words.
Public replies are visible marketing, but they are also part of your duty of care. The aim is to show calm, accountable communication without confirming anyone’s relationship with the agency or debating an individual case in public.
“Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We are pleased that you found the process clear and supportive. We appreciate your comments.”
“Thank you for raising this. We are sorry to hear that your experience did not meet the standard we aim for. We would welcome the opportunity to look into your concerns; please contact [named team or email route] so we can help.”
“Thank you for your feedback. To protect privacy, we cannot discuss individual circumstances here. Please contact [route] and a senior member of our team will review your concerns.”
Flag a review only where there is a clear platform-policy issue, such as impersonation, harassment, irrelevant content or personal information. Keep a screenshot, the review link, the policy category and a concise explanation. A review that is simply negative, unfair in tone or commercially inconvenient is not automatically removable. Google explains that policy-violating reviews can be removed, but reviews that remain visible should be handled with a measured response.
Public reviews are useful in context, not as isolated star badges scattered across every page. Look for repeated, specific themes that describe the service a prospective client or candidate genuinely wants to understand: specialist market knowledge, frank salary advice, speed of communication, accessible consultants, quality of briefings or post-placement support.
For example, a care-staffing agency might build a short, consented client story around responsiveness and compliance support. A manufacturing recruiter might use a client quotation about understanding shift patterns and technical skills. A professional-services recruiter might focus on discretion and briefing quality, without naming a confidential employer or role.
Use approved extracts on relevant sector and location pages, beside a clear description of the service. Do not edit a quotation so heavily that its meaning changes, and do not turn one person’s experience into an unqualified performance claim such as “we always fill roles within 48 hours”. Share the full pattern of genuine feedback through your website and social channels where permission allows; this guide to sharing reviews explains how to repurpose them more usefully.
A high average rating with a handful of reviews tells you less than a steady, ethical feedback process. Create a small monthly dashboard and discuss it in delivery meetings rather than treating it as a sales-only number.
Eligible people invited ÷ eligible people served. This checks whether consultants are following the process fairly.
New public reviews ÷ delivered invitations. Use it to improve timing and clarity, not to pressure people.
Percentage of reviews acknowledged within your internal service standard, plus unresolved critical-feedback cases.
Count recurring comments on communication, feedback, understanding of the brief, speed, compliance and professionalism.
Example: If 40 eligible client and candidate contacts received an invitation and 6 left a review, the completion rate is 15%. If most reviews mention slow feedback, that operational theme matters more than trying to increase the percentage by repeatedly chasing the same people.
For Google specifically, review profile actions alongside review activity. Google Business Profile performance can show searches, views and interactions for verified profiles, although available metrics vary by business. This helps you see whether a better-maintained profile is attracting more calls or website visits without claiming that reviews alone caused the change.
List every branch profile, review site, testimonial page and consultant-led request process. Remove duplicate or ineligible listings, check business details and identify any copied reviews that lack reuse permission.
Document eligible service milestones, exclusions, approved templates, consent records, escalation contacts and a no-incentives rule. Agree who can respond publicly and who approves sensitive replies.
Run the neutral invitation rule for a manageable cohort. Check delivery, opt-outs, candidate comfort, response times and the quality of feedback. Do not cherry-pick reviewers for the pilot.
Assess feedback themes, amend the service process where needed and train the wider team. If maintaining governance across branches is taking too much internal time, a fully managed review programme can help put the collection, response and reporting routine in place.
The aim is not to manufacture a flawless online reputation. It is to make the real quality of your agency easier to see: a fair request process, authentic feedback, thoughtful replies and visible evidence that you learn from what candidates and clients tell you. Start with one clear service trigger, protect confidentiality at every stage and build from there.
Yes, where the person had a genuine experience of your agency and a request is appropriate. Use a neutral, voluntary invitation after a defined service milestone, do not offer an incentive, and do not pressure them to give a particular rating or disclose personal details.
No. Asking only people you expect to be happy can amount to selective solicitation or review gating. Use a consistent eligibility rule based on a service stage, while excluding documented cases such as active disputes, opt-outs or safeguarding concerns.
No. Google prohibits incentives, including payment, discounts, free goods or services, in exchange for posting, changing or removing a review. A no-incentives policy is the simplest approach across your review programme.
Treat this as a separate permission request. A person posting publicly on Google does not automatically give permission for their quotation, name, photograph or employment details to be reused on your site, in adverts or in sales materials.
Acknowledge the feedback calmly, avoid confirming the reviewer’s relationship with the agency or discussing their case, and offer a private route to investigate. Escalate reviews involving discrimination, personal data, safeguarding or serious allegations.
Usually not. Google says eligible businesses make in-person contact with customers during stated hours; online-only businesses are ineligible. Do not create a virtual-office listing simply to obtain local reviews.
Take particular care. Current or former employment and contractual relationships can create conflicts of interest under platform rules, and public feedback may expose sensitive details. A private feedback route is often safer for this group.
Track invitation coverage, review completion rate, response discipline, unresolved issues and recurring service themes. For an eligible Google Business Profile, monitor available views, searches and interactions alongside review activity.
The guidance in this article was checked against the following current sources. Platforms, laws and interfaces can change, so confirm important details before acting.
We can build and manage the complete Review Flywheel around the way your business already works.
Have This Done For Me