Fake reviews
Reviews written by people who did not have the experience described, or reviews that deliberately misrepresent what happened. This includes positive reviews for your own business and negative reviews aimed at a competitor.
Review growth guide
A practical UK guide to avoiding bought, incentivised and conflicted Google reviews while building genuine customer feedback safely.
It can be tempting to make a slow Google review count move faster: buy a package of five-star ratings, offer a discount for feedback, or ask staff, relatives and friends to help. For a UK local business, those shortcuts can create a much bigger problem than they solve. Google requires reviews to reflect a genuine, unbiased experience, and it expressly prohibits fake engagement, incentives and conflicts of interest.
This guide explains what counts as fake, incentivised or manipulated feedback; why buying Google reviews is risky; whether employees, friends and family can review your business; and how to ask real customers for honest reviews without putting your Google Business Profile or reputation at risk.
A genuine review is an independent customer’s honest account of their real experience. It does not have to be glowing. A three-star review that fairly describes a real visit is more useful and more defensible than ten manufactured five-star reviews.
Reviews written by people who did not have the experience described, or reviews that deliberately misrepresent what happened. This includes positive reviews for your own business and negative reviews aimed at a competitor.
Reviews influenced by a benefit offered in return: money, a discount, a free item, a refund, a voucher, loyalty points or entry into a prize draw.
Reviews affected by a personal or professional conflict of interest, such as current or former employment, a family connection, a supplier relationship or a competitor relationship.
Ask real customers for an honest review of their genuine experience. Do not pay for it, reward it, script it, filter for happy customers only or recruit people with a connection to the business to write it.
Google’s Maps policy is particularly clear: a review must be based on a real experience and be genuine and unbiased. Its policy prohibits paid reviews, rewards in exchange for any review or review change, selective requests for positive feedback, and reviews affected by conflicts of interest. Read the Google Maps policy on fake engagement and rating manipulation for the full platform rules.
“Buy Google reviews” can mean an obvious offer of fifty five-star reviews for a fee. It can also mean a less obvious arrangement: an agency pays people to review you, a freelancer uses multiple accounts, a supplier adds reviews as part of an SEO package, or customers are offered cash back after leaving five stars. The label changes, but the underlying issue does not: the review is not independent.
| Tactic | Why it is a problem | Safer alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Paying for a package of five-star reviews | The reviewers may not be customers and the content is not independent. | Send a simple review request after every completed job or purchase. |
| “Reputation management” that guarantees review numbers or ratings | A guarantee can create pressure to use prohibited methods behind the scenes. | Use a provider that explains how it reaches real customers and does not promise ratings. |
| Giving cash, a discount or a freebie for a Google review | Google treats a benefit in exchange for a review, edit or removal as fake engagement. | Thank every customer for their custom, whether they review or not. |
| Asking people who have not used the business to “help out” | The review does not reflect an actual customer experience. | Ask only people who have genuinely bought from or used the business. |
| Paying for negative reviews of a rival | It is fake negative content intended to damage another business. | Improve your own service, evidence and local visibility instead. |
For example, a plumber who pays for ten reviews from people in different towns may see a temporary increase in review count, but none of those people can describe a real call-out, diagnosis, price explanation or finished repair. A salon that asks a marketing supplier to “sort out the reviews” without checking the method carries the same exposure if the supplier commissions fabricated feedback.
Google says it may remove policy-violating reviews and place restrictions on a Business Profile where it determines a business owner has breached its Fake Engagement policy. Possible restrictions include preventing new reviews or ratings for a period, unpublishing existing reviews or ratings for a period, and showing a consumer-facing warning that fake reviews were removed. The business can appeal, but an appeal is not a substitute for a sound collection process. See Google’s Business Profile restrictions for policy violations.
Do not assume that outsourcing makes a risky review tactic safe. The CMA’s guidance for businesses says not to commission third parties to write fake reviews and notes that a business may be liable for their actions. Put the permitted methods in writing before an agency, freelancer or staff member starts asking for reviews.
For commercial practices taking place from 6 April 2025, the unfair-commercial-practices provisions in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 explicitly cover fake reviews and concealed incentivised reviews. The CMA describes these banned practices as automatically unfair and illegal. That is wider than Google alone: it can apply to testimonials on your website, social posts, brochures and review-platform content as well as Maps listings. The CMA’s fake reviews guidance is the most useful starting point for UK businesses.
This is general business information rather than legal advice. If your business has already run a paid-review campaign, hosts reviews on its own website, operates in a regulated sector, or has received formal correspondence, take advice from a suitably qualified legal or compliance professional.
On Google, the rule is simple: do not offer anything in exchange for a review. Google lists payments, discounts, free goods and free services as examples, and the prohibition also covers asking someone to change a review or remove a negative review in exchange for a benefit. Google’s own review-request guidance confirms that these incentives are strictly prohibited.
The rule is not avoided by saying “we welcome all ratings” if the reward is still contingent on posting a Google review. Nor is it made safe by offering the incentive verbally at the till rather than in an email or social post.
A normal promotion that is available regardless of whether a customer writes, edits or removes a review is different from an incentive for reviewing. For instance, a café may run a general “buy nine coffees, get the tenth free” loyalty scheme. The café should not then tell customers that the free coffee depends on reviewing it on Google.
Likewise, you can send a genuine customer a thank-you email and include a review link. What you cannot do is add: “Leave us five stars and we’ll send you a voucher.” Google permits businesses to remind customers to review and to share a direct review link or QR code; it does not permit a reward for doing so. Its guidance on creating a Google review link or QR code gives examples of legitimate places to use it, including receipts, thank-you emails and post-service messages.
For Google reviews, take the stricter route: no incentive at all. The CMA’s guidance explains that, in some settings where a platform permits incentivised reviews, the incentive must be made clearly apparent and the review must be prominently identifiable as incentivised. However, the same guidance also notes that many platforms do not allow incentivised reviews; submitting one where the platform bans it is likely to be misleading. Google is one of those platforms with a clear no-incentives rule.
For testimonials on your own website or paid collaborations on social media, disclosure alone is not a licence to exaggerate, hide negative feedback or present advertising as independent customer opinion. The CMA advises businesses not to offer inducements for positive reviews and not to pretend to be customers. See the CMA’s review guidance for businesses and agencies.
Review gating means steering customers according to whether they appear happy. A common version is: “If you would give us five stars, please review us on Google. If not, use this private form instead.” That produces a distorted public picture because only selected happy customers are invited to the review platform.
Google’s policy says merchants must not discourage negative reviews or selectively solicit positive reviews. The CMA similarly warns against cherry-picking and against encouraging only satisfied customers to leave reviews. A private complaints route is valuable, but it must not become a barrier that keeps disappointed customers from publishing genuine feedback.
Ask every suitable customer after a completed transaction or service: “If you have a moment, we would appreciate an honest Google review.”
Ask “Were you happy?” and send a Google link only to people who say yes, while diverting everyone else to a private complaint form.
A driving instructor, for example, can send the same post-test message to each pupil who has completed lessons, whether they passed first time or not. A builder can ask every homeowner for feedback once the agreed snagging process is complete. The request should be consistent, low-pressure and separate from any request to resolve a complaint.
As a business practice, no: do not ask them to review your business on Google. Google treats reviews affected by a personal or professional conflict of interest as rating manipulation. Its examples include current or former employment, contractual or consultancy relationships, competitors and family relationships.
Employees should not review their employer’s business, even if they also use the service as a customer. Former employees should not be recruited to do it either. The employment relationship creates a conflict of interest, and asking staff to produce a certain number of reviews is also expressly listed by Google as an unacceptable practice.
That applies to everyone from a self-employed beautician working in a salon to a receptionist at a dental practice, a subcontractor regularly working for a builder, and an agency managing a local restaurant’s marketing. Their positive opinion may be sincere, but it is not independent customer feedback.
Family members should not leave Google reviews for the business. Friends are also not a sensible source of reviews where the personal relationship could reasonably affect their independence. The safest policy is simple: if you would feel awkward asking the person to write a critical review if their experience were poor, do not ask them to review at all.
Owners and directors must not review their own business. Nor should suppliers, shareholders, landlords, business partners, consultants or marketing agencies post reviews that appear to come from ordinary customers. If a supplier has experienced the service in a separate, genuine customer capacity, there may still be a commercial connection that makes a Google review inappropriate; do not use it as part of your review programme.
The same principle runs both ways. Never ask staff, relatives or supporters to leave negative reviews of a competing firm, and do not post one yourself under a personal account. A real customer is entitled to an honest negative review; a competitor-led attack is not legitimate customer feedback.
The sustainable alternative is not complicated. Build review requests into the real customer journey, use the same invitation for all eligible customers, and leave the decision entirely with them. Start with the practical steps in our guide to collecting reviews if you need help choosing the right touchpoints.
Ask after the service has been delivered or the customer has had a fair opportunity to use the product. For a locksmith, that may be after the job is completed and paid for. For a restaurant, it may be in a follow-up message the next day rather than while the customer is still seated.
Use one clear process for all customers in the chosen group. Do not decide who receives a Google link based on a satisfaction score, who you think will give five stars, or how well you know them.
Use Google’s own review link or QR code in an email, SMS, WhatsApp message, receipt or thank-you page. Let customers use their own device in their own time. Do not stand over them, hand them a shared tablet or require them to review while on the premises.
Say “honest review” rather than “five stars”. Do not supply suggested wording, ask for specific keywords, or request that a reviewer names a particular staff member. Their words should be their own.
Thank positive reviewers without turning the reply into an offer or promotion. For negative reviews, acknowledge the concern, avoid personal information, and invite the customer to continue the conversation privately where appropriate.
Record recurring themes such as late arrival, unclear pricing, wait times or excellent communication. The most valuable result of an honest review programme is a better customer experience, not just a higher total.
Hi [First name], thank you for choosing [Business name]. We hope everything went well. If you have a moment, we would really appreciate an honest review of your experience on Google. Your feedback helps other local customers and helps us improve. [Review link]
Thanks again,
[Name / Business name]
This message makes no promise, asks for no particular rating and gives the customer room to say what they genuinely think. It is suitable for a dog groomer, mobile mechanic, café, physiotherapy clinic or trades business when sent at the appropriate point in the customer journey.
A short written policy reduces the chance that someone with good intentions creates a costly problem. Make it part of induction, include it in agency scopes of work, and revisit it when you change booking, checkout or customer-service processes.
We ask genuine customers for honest feedback. We do not buy, write, exchange, edit or reward reviews; ask for five-star ratings; filter review invitations by customer satisfaction; ask employees, friends, family or suppliers to review us; or ask anyone to remove a negative review in return for a benefit. Any external supplier must follow this policy and explain its review-collection methods on request.
A capable provider helps you create a repeatable request process, protect the business’s ownership of its Google Profile and respond professionally to feedback. It does not sell reviews or make promises it cannot legitimately control. If maintaining that process is difficult alongside daily operations, a fully managed review programme can provide structure around genuine customer requests without resorting to shortcuts.
Act calmly and correct the process. Trying to conceal the activity, buy another batch to dilute it, or pressure reviewers to rewrite their posts can make the position worse.
Pause incentives, staff targets and supplier activity. Keep relevant invoices, messages, campaign terms and agency correspondence so you can establish what happened and who was involved. Ask a supplier in writing to stop any prohibited activity.
Check Google, your website, social media testimonials and any trade-directory profiles. Identify reviews that were bought, written by connected people, rewarded, scripted or obtained through positive-only screening. If you publish reviews on your own website, review whether you need to remove or clearly address misleading content.
Introduce the consistent, incentive-free customer request process above. Train staff, amend supplier instructions and focus on improving the service issues that genuine feedback reveals. If Google notifies you of a profile restriction and you believe the decision is mistaken, use the relevant appeal route and provide accurate context.
If you discover a review on your profile that is genuinely fake, off-topic or otherwise breaches Google policy, report it through the proper process rather than starting a public argument. Google explains that reviews are eligible for removal when they violate policy, not simply because the business dislikes or disagrees with them; its review reporting guidance also explains the available appeal path.
Do not give individual staff a target for obtaining a certain number of Google reviews. Google specifically prohibits merchants from asking staff to solicit a certain number. Instead, monitor the customer journey and the quality of your request process.
For a simple system your team can run themselves, see the DIY Review Flywheel Software option. Whatever system you choose, it should make it easier to contact genuine customers consistently, never to manufacture their opinion.
The right review strategy is not about finding a loophole. It is about making it straightforward for real customers to share what actually happened, then using their feedback to improve. That protects your Google Business Profile, gives prospective customers a more believable picture and creates marketing material that reflects the service you really provide.
Buying or commissioning reviews that are not based on a genuine experience is prohibited by Google and can also breach UK consumer-protection law. Since 6 April 2025, fake reviews and concealed incentivised reviews are explicitly covered by banned-practice rules under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.
No. Google prohibits incentives in exchange for posting, changing or removing a review, regardless of the rating requested. Do not tie discounts, free items, vouchers, loyalty points or prize draws to reviewing on Google.
No. Entry into a prize draw is a benefit offered in exchange for a review, so it should not be used for Google reviews. Run promotions independently of reviewing instead.
Do not ask them to. Google treats current and former employment as a conflict of interest for reviews. The safer policy is that employees, contractors and agency partners do not review the business they work for.
Family members should not review the business. Friends should also not be used as reviewers where their personal relationship affects independence. Focus requests on unrelated, genuine customers.
No. Ask for an honest review, not a particular rating, wording or keyword. A request for five stars attempts to influence the content and undermines the independence of the review.
Review gating is the practice of directing only happy customers to a public review platform while sending unhappy customers to a private complaints route. Google prohibits selectively soliciting positive reviews, and the CMA warns against cherry-picking feedback.
Yes. Google allows businesses to share a direct review link or QR code with real customers. Use it in a receipt, follow-up email, message or thank-you page, without a reward or pressure to review on the premises.
Tell the agency in writing to stop, preserve the relevant records, audit the reviews and update your contract and internal policy. Do not try to hide the issue by buying more reviews. Seek appropriate legal or compliance advice if the situation is significant or you publish reviews yourself.
The guidance in this article was checked against the following current sources. Platforms, laws and interfaces can change, so confirm important details before acting.
We can build and manage the complete Review Flywheel around the way your business already works.
Have This Done For Me