Trust before contact
Recent, specific reviews can help a patient understand what it may feel like to call, arrive and be cared for at your practice.
Review growth guide
A practical UK guide to collecting, responding to and sharing dental patient reviews ethically, professionally and without compromising confidentiality.
Dental practice review marketing is the structured, ethical process of inviting patients to share honest feedback, responding safely and using real experiences to help future patients choose with confidence. Done well, it gives your team a clearer view of the patient journey as well as making your practice easier to assess online.
Dental reviews need more care than reviews for many local businesses. A restaurant can thank a diner for visiting; a dental practice must not confirm that a reviewer is a patient, discuss treatment or disclose any clinical detail. This guide shows how to create a useful system that respects professional standards, privacy and consumer law.
Choosing a dentist is personal. A prospective patient may be comparing practices for routine family care, a dental emergency, nervous-patient support, hygiene appointments, implants, orthodontics or cosmetic treatment. They are usually looking for practical reassurance: clear explanations, considerate staff, cleanliness, appointment availability, transparent fees and how concerns are handled.
That makes the experience of care an appropriate subject for a review. It does not make a patient review clinical evidence or a licence to make sweeping claims about outcomes. Your job is to help genuine feedback appear consistently, then use it to improve the service patients actually receive.
Recent, specific reviews can help a patient understand what it may feel like to call, arrive and be cared for at your practice.
Repeated comments about reception, waiting times, clarity or follow-up reveal service issues that a star average alone will miss.
Reviews are one part of a complete local presence. Accurate practice information, services, website content and patient experience still matter. For the wider picture, see the guide to how Google Maps rankings work.
Aim for a steady, representative flow of feedback from real patients. Do not chase a perfect rating, ask only delighted patients or attempt to steer the wording. A balanced review profile is more credible and gives the practice better information.
A review programme should be simple enough for a receptionist, treatment coordinator or practice manager to follow every day. It also needs clear boundaries. Put these in a one-page internal policy, train the whole team and make one person responsible for reviewing it each quarter.
Google permits businesses to invite customers to leave reviews through a link or QR code, but the review must reflect a genuine experience. Its policy prohibits incentives, selectively seeking positive reviews, pressuring people to review while on the premises and asking for particular wording or named staff members. Google’s review content policy is explicit on these points.
In practice, this means no prize draw for a five-star review, no free scale and polish in exchange for feedback, no staff target such as ten reviews before Friday, and no spreadsheet that contacts only patients marked as happy. Invite an appropriate, consistent group of patients after a completed interaction, and leave the rating and content entirely to them.
There is a wider legal reason to be disciplined. Since 6 April 2025, consumer protection rules have specifically addressed fake reviews, concealed incentivised reviews and misleading review information. If you publish reviews or ratings on media you control, you need reasonable and proportionate procedures to prevent and remove banned content. The CMA’s business guide to consumer reviews explains the responsibility for businesses that publish them.
The General Dental Council requires dental professionals to protect confidentiality. This covers personal details, treatment, medical history and costs. Its standards also say that patient information must not be posted on social media, and that any use of patient information or images needs clear explanation, recorded consent and only the minimum necessary information. Read the GDC’s standards on maintaining and protecting patient information.
Therefore, a public reply must never say or imply: ‘We are pleased your root canal went well’, ‘We can see you attended last Tuesday’, ‘Dr Patel explained your implant plan’ or ‘Your balance was explained at your check-up’. Even when a reviewer volunteers those facts, the practice should not validate, correct or add to them.
Take a critical review seriously, but do not try to investigate it in public. The GDC requires an effective complaints procedure that is readily available, followed consistently and handled constructively. A private-practice procedure should follow similar standards and time limits to the NHS or equivalent health-service route. Keep the public response brief and move the conversation to your formal process where appropriate. See the GDC’s complaints procedure standard.
A Google review left publicly is not a blank cheque to put the patient’s words into a paid advert, Instagram graphic, website banner or practice brochure. When a testimonial is used in marketing, CAP rules require permission, evidence that it is genuine and contact details for the person who gave it. Claims within the testimonial must not mislead. CAP’s guidance on testimonials and endorsements sets out the standard.
For dentistry, be stricter still. Health information receives extra protection under UK GDPR. A review, photograph or video that reveals treatment, health status or a care experience can involve health data. The ICO defines health data broadly to include information connected with the provision of healthcare. The ICO’s special category data guidance explains why it needs greater care.
Get a separate, written permission before reusing a patient’s words alongside their name, image, treatment detail, before-and-after photographs or video. Make it specific about where the material will appear, whether it may be promoted, how long you intend to use it and how the patient can withdraw permission. For complex cases, or where a review request is sent by email or text using patient contact data, obtain advice from your data protection lead, dental defence organisation or appropriately qualified adviser.
A review request cannot compensate for an inaccurate or neglected online presence. Before you invite patients, make it easy for them to check that they have found the right practice and to take the next step.
| Foundation | What good looks like | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile | Correct practice name, address, telephone number, opening hours, website, appointment link, primary category and current photos. | Practice manager |
| Website contact journey | Mobile-friendly contact details, clear new-patient information, services, clinician information, fees where applicable and a straightforward booking route. | Practice manager or web lead |
| Review destination | One verified, team-approved review link or QR code that opens the correct practice profile. | Named review owner |
| Response access | At least two trusted people have secure, appropriate access to monitor and respond. Access is removed promptly when a team member leaves. | Practice owner |
| Consent records | A separate, searchable record for any testimonial, photo, video or case-study permission. | Compliance lead |
For a detailed setup checklist, use the complete Google Business Profile guide for UK businesses. Keep the review invitation separate from appointment reminders and clinical communications so the team can manage it consistently.
The best system is not the most elaborate one. It is a respectful workflow that happens at a sensible time, reaches a fair cross-section of patients and does not create pressure. The practice can invite feedback after a routine examination, hygiene appointment, emergency visit, completed treatment phase or successful new-patient visit. It should not wait only for a glowing verbal compliment.
Assign a practice manager or senior team member to maintain the invitation process, check the review link, monitor incoming feedback and report monthly themes. Clinicians can encourage a service culture, but they should not be put under pressure to obtain named reviews.
For example, send an invitation one or two days after a completed appointment, or offer a take-home card at reception. The trigger should be based on the completed interaction, not the team’s guess about whether the patient is pleased.
Use the official Google review link or QR code generated for the verified practice profile. A QR code on a printed aftercare card can be helpful, but do not ask people to write a review in reception or hand them a device to do it there. Give them space to decide later.
Use the same neutral wording for everyone: ask whether they would be willing to share an honest experience. Do not mention five stars, say that a clinician needs a review or suggest topics to include.
Track how many invitations were delivered, the date and the channel. Do not copy a patient’s review into clinical records or create a list that labels people as positive or negative reviewers. Escalate any concern through the correct complaints and governance route.
Hello [first name], thank you for visiting [practice name]. We are always looking to improve the experience we provide. If you would like to share honest feedback about your visit, you can leave a review here: [review link]. There is no obligation, and we appreciate you taking the time. If there is anything you would prefer to discuss directly with us, please contact [practice contact route].
Thank you for coming in today. If you ever wish to leave honest feedback about your experience, this card has a link you can use when convenient. And if there is anything we can improve, please do let us know directly.
Review requests by electronic message can be direct marketing depending on their purpose and context. Check your privacy notice, contact preferences and the applicable UK GDPR and PECR position before using email, SMS or WhatsApp at scale. A polite, optional in-person invitation or take-home card is often the simplest starting point.
Reviews should feed into practice management, not sit with marketing. Set aside 20 minutes each week to read new feedback and log recurring themes. Separate the review itself from any identifiable patient information, and record general learning such as ‘patients are unclear about late-running appointments’ rather than copying a detailed public comment into an internal action log.
Simple monthly review: invitations delivered → reviews received → themes identified → action assigned → improvement checked next month.
A three-star review may contain more useful operational information than a short five-star review. For example, repeated praise for a nervous-patient approach tells you what to preserve; several comments about delays may justify reviewing scheduling, emergency slots or how the reception team updates people waiting in the practice.
Google encourages businesses to reply professionally, briefly and constructively, while protecting privacy. It also provides a flagging route for reviews that breach content rules. Google’s guidance on getting and replying to reviews is useful, but dentistry needs an additional confidentiality filter.
Public response: Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We appreciate it and will pass your kind words to the team.
Why it works: It is warm, does not confirm patient status or treatment, and does not turn the reply into an advert.
Public response: Thank you for your feedback. We are sorry to hear that your experience did not meet expectations. We would welcome the opportunity to look into your concerns; please contact our practice manager on [contact route].
Why it works: It acknowledges the concern without debating facts or disclosing information.
Public response: Do not accuse the reviewer of lying in public. Where appropriate, use a neutral invitation to contact the practice, retain evidence and report content that appears to breach the platform policy.
Why it works: It protects the practice’s tone while you use the correct platform and governance route.
Dental versus everyday hospitality replies: a salon can safely say ‘It was lovely to see you’; a dental practice should avoid language that confirms someone attended. In healthcare, restraint is a strength, not a cold response.
For more examples, including neutral ways to handle praise, delays, price concerns and suspected fake feedback, read how to respond to every type of customer review. Adapt any general template to your confidentiality obligations before using it in dentistry.
When you have clear permission, a review can become a useful proof point on your website, in a new-patient guide, on social media or in a printed welcome pack. The aim is not to create a wall of superlatives. It is to show the experiences that matter to patients, accurately and in context.
Use a clearly labelled testimonial section. Keep the quote accurate, identify only what the person has permitted and avoid adding a treatment outcome claim that the patient did not make.
Use a consented quote graphic without clinical detail. Do not pair a review with a patient photograph, radiograph or before-and-after image unless the permission expressly covers that use.
Apply the strictest check: permission, evidence of authenticity, factual substantiation for measurable claims and a clear understanding of where the ad will appear.
Do not present a hand-picked quotation as an overall rating, and do not create a website reviews tool unless you are prepared to manage it properly. If your site publishes consumer reviews or review information, the CMA expects a clear policy against fake reviews and procedures proportionate to the risk. A simple, curated testimonial section is different from operating an open review platform, but it still needs truthful labelling, permission and reliable records.
Keep the original review or signed approval, the date, the precise approved wording, the channels authorised and any end date in a consent register. Review this register before refreshing a website or launching a campaign. For a broader approach to reusing customer proof, see ways to share reviews across your local marketing.
Check Google Business Profile access, accuracy and review link. Choose a review owner and a second approver for sensitive public replies. Read the existing complaints procedure alongside this workflow.
Create a one-page do-and-don’t guide. Cover neutral invitations, no incentives, confidentiality, response escalation, permission for testimonials and where to record learning. Role-play the reception wording.
Start with a take-home card, approved email or approved message route. Use the same invitation after relevant completed appointments. Check that the link opens the correct profile on a mobile phone.
Measure invitation coverage, incoming feedback, response time and recurring issues. Fix one practical service problem, such as clearer delay updates or better new-patient directions, then report the change to the team.
The sustainable approach is straightforward: deliver an experience worth talking about, invite broad and honest feedback without pressure, protect confidentiality in every public interaction and act on the patterns patients reveal. Start with one channel, one owner and one careful monthly review. Consistency and trust will take you further than any shortcut.
If you need help building the practical collection workflow, explore the review collection tools and process before expanding into wider local marketing.
Yes. Google allows businesses to ask for genuine feedback through a review link or QR code. The request must be neutral: do not offer incentives, ask for five stars, filter for happy patients or pressure people to review on the premises. <a href=’Google Business Profile guidance; target=’_blank’ rel=’noopener’>Google’s policy explains the restrictions</a>.
No. Google prohibits incentives in exchange for a review, rating change or removal of criticism. UK consumer protection law also prohibits concealed incentivised reviews. <a href=’Google Business Profile guidance; target=’_blank’ rel=’noopener’>See Google’s review guidance</a> and <a href=’GOV.UK guidance; target=’_blank’ rel=’noopener’>the CMA guide</a>.
Yes, but keep it general. Thank the reviewer for their feedback without confirming they are a patient, mentioning their visit or referring to treatment. The reviewer may disclose clinical details; the practice should not add to or validate them.
Acknowledge the concern calmly, invite the person to contact the practice privately and follow your complaints process where appropriate. Do not debate the facts, disclose information or ask the reviewer to remove the review. The GDC requires a clear, effective and constructive complaints procedure. <a href=’Standards Gdc Uk Org guidance; target=’_blank’ rel=’noopener’>Read the GDC standard</a>.
Yes. Retain relevant evidence and use the platform’s reporting route if the content appears to breach its rules, such as being off-topic, abusive, fake or based on a conflict of interest. Do not publicly accuse the reviewer or attempt to buy removal.
Treat a reused review as a marketing testimonial. CAP guidance says marketers need permission to feature testimonials and must hold evidence that they are genuine. In dental marketing, obtain clear written permission, particularly if the material reveals treatment or is used with an image. <a href=’Asa Org Uk guidance; target=’_blank’ rel=’noopener’>See CAP’s testimonial guidance</a>.
A patient may choose what to write, but the practice should not request a named-clinician mention. Google’s policy says businesses should not ask for specific review content, including content identifying a staff member. <a href=’Google Business Profile guidance; target=’_blank’ rel=’noopener’>Read the policy</a>.
Set an internal service standard that your team can meet consistently, such as checking reviews on working days and triaging serious concerns promptly. Accuracy, confidentiality and proper escalation matter more than posting a rushed public response.
The guidance in this article was checked against the following current sources. Platforms, laws and interfaces can change, so confirm important details before acting.
We can build and manage the complete Review Flywheel around the way your business already works.
Have This Done For Me